1998 | Volume 5, Number 1


Student Perception & Knowledge About Information Technology: A Computer Attitude and Experience Survey to Measure Changes
                    Raymond Papp

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the results ofa survey ofover 100 undergraduates to determine whether their perceptions, knowledge, andattitudes about information technology have changedas a result ofcompleting an introductory course in computer concepts and literacy. The survey was administered to the students during the first class and then again at the end ofthe semester. The results were compared to determine ifany changes occurred over time.

The survey measured students' attitude and perception changes alongfive dimensions: Attitude toward Technology, KlWwledge of Technology, Desire to Learn, Perceived Importance of Technology, and Technology Literacy. A factor analysis was used to group the questions into categories andpre- andpost-class surveys were subjected to mean comparisons. Results indicate that students enjoyed learning about technology and have shown large increases in their confidence, ability and knowledge about computers.

Pedagogical implications are two-fold. Students completing the course showed marked gains in their knowledge, desire to learn, and their perception ofthe importance oftechnology. Second, the survey seems to lend supportfor the needregarding such a course in the undergraduate business core as a means for students to build vitally important skills and literacy in technology.


ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Raymond Papp is an assistant professor in the Department ofMIS at Central Connecticut State University. He completed his doctorate in Information Management at Stevens Institute ofTechnology. His teaching and research interests include strategic impacts of infonnation technology, Internet-based distance learning education, pedagogical implications of learning, and emerging information technologies. Dr. Papp has presented at several professional and executive conferences and maintains an active training/consulting practice in his areas of specialization. He has worked as a computer analyst, corporate trainer, and consultant.


Return to the Table of Contents